News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Flying a Cessna 172 for 65 days nonstop by codezero on Saturday October 06, 2018 @11:37AM (#18155645)
Awesome story but I’m really disappointed in the lack of photos. Does anyone have any good links?

Some fun facts: They refueled twice a day

They bathed by using a bottle of water

They didn’t sleep well and once overslept and ran on autopilot

They refueled from a truck that drove under them. They hoisted a hose up. Their generator died half way through and they had to use a hand pump the rest of the time.

It was really boring up there.

Re:Flying a Cessna 172 for 65 days nonstop by cpncrunch on Saturday October 06, 2018 @12:52PM (#18156005)
Re:Flying a Cessna 172 for 65 days nonstop by wtvanhest on Saturday October 06, 2018 @02:55PM (#18156636)
That is a great article. It is too bad they dont have more photos.
Re:Flying a Cessna 172 for 65 days nonstop by cyberferret on Saturday October 06, 2018 @08:01PM (#18158083)
I scoured the article to find out how they refuelled - the details were buried towards the end. Wow, what a way to transfer supplies and refuel 'on the wing' with a truck speeding along on the ground. A feat in itself. To to do this around 130 times without a major incident is remarkable.

EDIT: I'm also disappointed in lack of photos of the aviators and the aircraft. I am hoping the plane is still preserved somewhere and there are recent photos of it.

Re:Flying a Cessna 172 for 65 days nonstop by casual_slacker on Saturday October 06, 2018 @08:26PM (#18158155)
Here's another article with a picture of the refueling:

https://disciplesofflight.com/flight-endurance/

Re:Flying a Cessna 172 for 65 days nonstop by jokoon on Saturday October 06, 2018 @03:16PM (#18156733)
The cessna take off speed is 100Km/h, does that mean that refueling truck had to go around that same speed, or maybe a little slower since the airplane did not have to rise?

Or did they have a modified wing?

Re:Flying a Cessna 172 for 65 days nonstop by cjbprime on Saturday October 06, 2018 @03:35PM (#18156818)
Am not a pilot, but why would they need takeoff speed, rather than to just stay above the minimum speed before stalling? That $V_s0$ speed is more like 65Km/h.
Re:Flying a Cessna 172 for 65 days nonstop by JshWright on Saturday October 06, 2018 @04:18PM (#18157044)
Also important to note that's airspeed, not ground speed. If they're driving/flying into a headwind, the ground speed (the speed the truck cares about) is even lower.
Re:Flying a Cessna 172 for 65 days nonstop by dbcurtis on Saturday October 06, 2018 @06:54PM (#18157787)
I think stall spoed with full flaps is around 35 mph, so 50kph-ish
Re:Flying a Cessna 172 for 65 days nonstop by logosmonkey on Saturday October 06, 2018 @07:48PM (#18158038)
Yeah right around there for the 172. You usually do slow flight work right around 40kts
Re:Flying a Cessna 172 for 65 days nonstop by qume on Saturday October 06, 2018 @08:30PM (#18158174)
I build camera gear for 172s and fly (as passenger, not pilot) probably 20-30 days per year, sometimes much more, and I get nervous at <60kts at low altitude.

40kts IAS is I guess around the full flaps stall speed but you sure don't want to be doing that intentionally. At least not with me in the plane please.