Re:Zuckerberg Faces Anger Over Facebook Executive’s Kavanaug...
by dickinson99 on Friday October 05, 2018 @09:45AM
(#18148043)
>Ford's testimony appeared credible
Did you even watch it?
Re:Zuckerberg Faces Anger Over Facebook Executive’s Kavanaug...
by viggity on Friday October 05, 2018 @11:16AM
(#18148782)
yes. the entire thing.
Re:Zuckerberg Faces Anger Over Facebook Executive’s Kavanaug...
by jki275 on Friday October 05, 2018 @10:08AM
(#18148217)
I did, and I think she made up the entire thing.
For a while I thought maybe she was assaulted in some way and was completely confused about when it happened and who was involved, but after the polygraph comments were refuted by her ex-boyfriend that sealed the deal for me -- it's almost axiomatic that because of her field of study she would be well informed on the subject, her denials to Ms. Mitchell seemed odd, but it appears clear now that she in fact did lie about it. That's not a minor detail, it's a very big deal.
Re:Zuckerberg Faces Anger Over Facebook Executive’s Kavanaug...
by viggity on Friday October 05, 2018 @11:21AM
(#18148832)
contemporaneous corroboration. Again, nobody has addressed all the holes as addressed by Rachel Mitchell.
Re:Zuckerberg Faces Anger Over Facebook Executive’s Kavanaug...
by sjg007 on Friday October 05, 2018 @12:06PM
(#18149214)
Sure, let's make stuff up, like her memo.
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/10/02/rachel-mitche...
Ramirez, Swetnik allegations are not credible. They too have no corroboration.
While I've seen plenty of people decry Rachel Mitchell's letter to the Republican Senators as "political", I have yet to see anyone refute the content of that letter. (https://www.axios.com/brett-kavanaugh-rachel-mitchell-prosec...)
There isn't an honest prosecutor who could get an indictment, let alone a conviction.