Re:What Businessweek got wrong about Apple
by miracle2k on Friday October 05, 2018 @06:36AM
(#18147038)
Maybe vehemence isn't the right measure. It would be better to say specificity. "The allegations are false" leaves more wiggle room then to say "we don't have a business relationship with Suoermicro and a Company called Apple doesn't even exist".
Re:What Businessweek got wrong about Apple
by brorfred on Friday October 05, 2018 @10:39AM
(#18148464)
I saw figures that Bloomberg had 17 sources for this story. For that to in nay way be realistic, this must be a deliberate leak by the US government. Why would they put such a strong gag order on Apple/Amazon and then leak the information themselves? It makes no sense.
Re:What Businessweek got wrong about Apple
by ItsMe000001 on Saturday October 06, 2018 @02:11AM
(#18153801)
Then it would make no sense for it to not be true either, unless one assumes the government to spread lies to damage those companies, which also makes no sense.
> People claiming gag orders are crazy, mostly for thinking that Apple, or anyone else for that matter, would ever sign a document forcing them to lie to their customers
Why do you think a "gag order" is something that has to be signed off on by the one getting it? That too does not make any sense. An order is issued by someone who has more power, here, the government. You don't have to sign anything for the order to exist. "Gag order" has "order" right in the name.