Re:New Zealand travellers refusing digital search now face $...
by paradite on Monday October 01, 2018 @12:36PM
(#18114281)
> It wouldn't stop those things though, there will always be a weak point.
If that is your argument, then I don't think anyone can convince you.
> What it would do is erode the rights and freedoms of law abiding citizens (something that terrorists seem to want).
That's not how Wikipedia (and I myself) define terrorism:
> Terrorism is, in the broadest sense, the use of intentionally indiscriminate violence as a means to create terror among masses of people; or fear to achieve a financial, political, religious or ideological aim.
Re:New Zealand travellers refusing digital search now face $...
by malnourish on Monday October 01, 2018 @03:28PM
(#18115960)
I can be convinced when the argument is good. I don't think a nebulous, "give up your privacy for some possible safety gains" is such an argument. I equate privacy with freedom, and I don't want to give up my freedom.
Furthermore, if you want to stop drug trafficking, legalize them.