Cincinnati Joins the List of Cities Saying ‘No’ to Parking Minimums

Re:Cincinnati Joins the List of Cities Saying ‘No’ to Parkin... by mikepurvis on Sunday September 30, 2018 @05:15PM (#18108456)

It'll be possible to pack them way, way more tightly if a) the structure itself is able to move the cars around at will, and b) you can give it an estimate of what time you'll be back (or 30 mins notice for the "standby" option).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Cincinnati Joins the List of Cities Saying ‘No’ to Parkin... by derefr on Sunday September 30, 2018 @07:46PM (#18109097)

At that point, it's less of a parking structure and more of an automated valet service. You get out of your car and only your car enters.

Taken to the limit of the idea, the whole parking structure could be entirely sealed to the outside, and maybe even evacuated or filled with a non-oxygenated medium (e.g. nitrogen) to prevent car fires and reduce rusting from long-term storage. Sort of like a modern grain silo.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Cincinnati Joins the List of Cities Saying ‘No’ to Parkin... by slavik81 on Monday October 01, 2018 @12:04AM (#18109966)

My line of thought started from, "what would the world be like if every vehicle had a built-in valet?" I think the design of commercial areas would change dramatically within a couple decades, even just from the effect on parking.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Cincinnati Joins the List of Cities Saying ‘No’ to Parkin... by MBCook on Sunday September 30, 2018 @05:25PM (#18108511)

Excellent point. I hadn’t even thought of all the driving lanes and ramps that you no longer need.

[ Parent | on HN ]