News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Voting Machine Used in Half of U.S. Is Vulnerable to Atta... by contravariant on Friday September 28, 2018 @12:42PM (#18094777)
That's only possible if you sacrifice some of the stronger anonymity requirements. In theory you shouldn't be able to prove you voted a particular way to ensure you can't be intimidated into changing you vote.

Unless it's good enough to verify whether your vote was counted, that should be fairly easy to do.

Re:Voting Machine Used in Half of U.S. Is Vulnerable to Atta... by yoha on Friday September 28, 2018 @01:27PM (#18095167)
> That's only possible if you sacrifice some of the stronger anonymity requirements

Untrue. You can use strong encryption to ensure confidentiality and zero-knowledge proofs to ensure integrity. Then, you can use methods from homomorphic encryption to tally the ballots. There is a whole area of research dedicated to this.

Re:Voting Machine Used in Half of U.S. Is Vulnerable to Atta... by dogcomplex on Friday September 28, 2018 @02:00PM (#18095522)
So in your opinion the problem is (theoretically) solved? As in, we can have anonymous, verifiable, online, direct democracy such that 3rd parties cannot verify your vote without your private key?
Re:Voting Machine Used in Half of U.S. Is Vulnerable to Atta... by yoha on Friday September 28, 2018 @02:17PM (#18095667)
As I said in another comment, individual verifiability and non-coercion are mutually exclusive online. However, there are indeed solutions for the other properties (including global integrity), and compromises between individual verifiability and non-coercion. For instance, you can have a look at Helios [1] or Belenios [2]. Current research is looking for stronger guarantees, a better compromise, or a more interesting voting system (such as Single Transferable Vote or Majority Judgment).

[1] https://vote.heliosvoting.org/

[2] http://www.belenios.org/