Re:Voting Machine Used in Half of U.S. Is Vulnerable to Atta...
by yoha on Friday September 28, 2018 @01:27PM
(#18095167)
> That's only possible if you sacrifice some of the stronger anonymity requirements
Untrue. You can use strong encryption to ensure confidentiality and zero-knowledge proofs to ensure integrity. Then, you can use methods from homomorphic encryption to tally the ballots. There is a whole area of research dedicated to this.
Re:Voting Machine Used in Half of U.S. Is Vulnerable to Atta...
by dogcomplex on Friday September 28, 2018 @02:00PM
(#18095522)
So in your opinion the problem is (theoretically) solved? As in, we can have anonymous, verifiable, online, direct democracy such that 3rd parties cannot verify your vote without your private key?
Re:Voting Machine Used in Half of U.S. Is Vulnerable to Atta...
by yoha on Friday September 28, 2018 @02:17PM
(#18095667)
As I said in another comment, individual verifiability and non-coercion are mutually exclusive online. However, there are indeed solutions for the other properties (including global integrity), and compromises between individual verifiability and non-coercion. For instance, you can have a look at Helios [1] or Belenios [2]. Current research is looking for stronger guarantees, a better compromise, or a more interesting voting system (such as Single Transferable Vote or Majority Judgment).
Unless it's good enough to verify whether your vote was counted, that should be fairly easy to do.