Re:K3s: Kubernetes without the features I don't care about
by ofrzeta on Thursday September 27, 2018 @01:05PM
(#18086444)
I guess you are right. It's unfortunate because judging from the comments here you would think that there's a market for a simpler orchestration software while it will be hard to compete as just another Kubernetes distributor (even more so now that there are several alternatives for the container runtime). But hey, what do I know about product management?! :)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:K3s: Kubernetes without the features I don't care about
by josegonzalez on Thursday September 27, 2018 @03:17PM
(#18087725)
Nomad is that. We run Nomad quite successfully at SeatGeek, and I know of several Very Large Companies™ doing so at scale as well. One of them even has a fruit logo.
Re:K3s: Kubernetes without the features I don't care about
by ofrzeta on Friday September 28, 2018 @08:32AM
(#18092788)
You are using the enterprise version, I assume?
Re:K3s: Kubernetes without the features I don't care about
by josegonzalez on Monday October 01, 2018 @01:27AM
(#18110244)
We are running the OSS version of Consul, Nomad, and Vault. While the enterprise versions provide some items that could be interesting, they are not necessary given our workflow, and I'd bet that the majority of development shops out there wouldn't need them either (though I am certainly more than happy to play with them!).