News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Demolishing the California Dream: How SF Planned Its Own ... by hfdgiutdryg on Wednesday September 26, 2018 @01:43PM (#18078403)
lots of government regulation of what people build and do on their property.

That's an inevitable result of population density.

Re:Demolishing the California Dream: How SF Planned Its Own ... by dsfyu404ed on Wednesday September 26, 2018 @01:54PM (#18078526)
Regulation and involvement are two different things. Many cities are basically shall-issue when it comes to permitting. Others hand out variances like colleges hand out condoms.
Re:Demolishing the California Dream: How SF Planned Its Own ... by hfdgiutdryg on Wednesday September 26, 2018 @02:19PM (#18078769)
I don't see how your response has any relation to what I wrote. It looks more like moving goalposts to me.
Re:Demolishing the California Dream: How SF Planned Its Own ... by dsfyu404ed on Wednesday September 26, 2018 @02:28PM (#18078859)
I'm saying that regulating zoning in an of itself is something all cities do but they do it to wildly varying extents (e.g. SF vs. Houston) and it doesn't correlated as directly with population as you're saying it does. It's also possible to regulate something (i.e. have zoning rules) but still take a very hands-off approach.