News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Demolishing the California Dream: How SF Planned Its Own ... by gamblor956 on Wednesday September 26, 2018 @01:30PM (#18078270)
LA has been building a lot of housing the past few years; DTLA itself nearly 50,000 units built/being built over a 3 year window. The problem wasn't zoning.

Unlike Texas, Oklahoma, or Kansas, we have these things called "earthquakes" that can cause significant amounts of damage and death and our building codes are more rigorous to minimize those risks. This also makes it more expensive to build housing--but that's a good thing. You don't want a ton of people living in shoddy houses that will collapse and kill them.

Re:Demolishing the California Dream: How SF Planned Its Own ... by dsfyu404ed on Wednesday September 26, 2018 @02:30PM (#18078886)
Oklahoma, Kansas and parts of Texas have tornados but those states have enough self-restraint to not regulate trailer parks out of existence.
Re:Demolishing the California Dream: How SF Planned Its Own ... by ModernMech on Wednesday September 26, 2018 @04:59PM (#18080239)
When was the last time a tornado caused 3000 deaths, as happened in 1906 quake?
Re:Demolishing the California Dream: How SF Planned Its Own ... by khuey on Wednesday September 26, 2018 @01:44PM (#18078425)
Per the ACS, Los Angeles County had 3.49 million homes in 2016, and 3.45 million homes in 2013. If your numbers for DTLA are accurate then nowhere else in the county is building anything.

(Just to keep up with US population growth Los Angeles County needs to build over 30k homes every year.)

Re:Demolishing the California Dream: How SF Planned Its Own ... by gamblor956 on Wednesday September 26, 2018 @02:01PM (#18078600)
I was not aware that it was still 2016...

While a few notable buildings opened up in downtown during that 2013-2016 time period (i.e., 8th and Grand, One Santa Fe in the Arts District, the Whole Foods Lofts, the Last Italian Fortress), most of the units in downtown have only recently come onto the market, i.e., in 2017 and 2018.

Some of the biggest developments in the Arts District and South Park are still under construction, and the biggest developments only broke ground this summer.

Re:Demolishing the California Dream: How SF Planned Its Own ... by khuey on Wednesday September 26, 2018 @10:47PM (#18081786)
The Census doesn't have data later than 2016 but other sources lead me to believe that things haven't really changed.

https://la.curbed.com/2017/4/13/15288974/la-metro-housing-co...

Re:Demolishing the California Dream: How SF Planned Its Own ... by bgorman on Wednesday September 26, 2018 @01:32PM (#18078290)
If you look at Los Angeles you can clearly see that the problem is zoning. The only high rises are in the downtown area. It looks almost comical. The vast majority of the city is zoned for single family homes.
Re:Demolishing the California Dream: How SF Planned Its Own ... by gamblor956 on Wednesday September 26, 2018 @01:49PM (#18078485)
That's FUD.

LA has no single center of gravity. We have high rises in Downtown, along Wilshire in Korea Town, in MidCity/Beverly Center, Beverly Hills, Century City, Culver City. LA has hundreds of multi-unit apartment and mixed use buildings. Between downtown and the beach, most of the area is zoned for multi-unit residential with multi-unit buildings scattered between single-family blocks. Only a few neighborhoods are entirely single-family homes.