> The trending page isn't algorithmically created. It's curated by google employees.
It's a hybrid.
> Isn't that the point of youtube. You watch what you are interested in? Do you think we should all be forced to watch what you want?
No, wasn't this the entire premise of my joke explained back to me? If so... I mean... thanks for the review, "liftbigweights."
People who make silly videos are frightening? If you say so.
> It's a hybrid.
No it's not algorithmically determined like you claimed? It's superficially hybrid. Ultimately, the final decision is made by employees.
> No, wasn't this the entire premise of my joke explained back to me?
No. It was a rhetorical question outlining the absurdity of your insistence that content be curated to your personal liking. Okay "kirindave", he who wants everything his own way.
You misread my post and have drawn an incorrect conclusion as to what I meant or intend to say. I do apologise for my part today's round of your confusion, Mr. Lift BigWeights.
But please, sir, I am not a "he" and I'll thank you kindly to take that mis-gendering somewhere where it's welcome. Perhaps a collapsed neutron star? That would be the biggest weight you could lift, indeed.
The trending page isn't algorithmically created. It's curated by google employees.
> That Youtube is awful. People are awful. Fortnite Battle Royale is awful. I don't want to see any of those.
Then don't. I'm sure most people probably think what you are watching is awful. Isn't that the point of youtube. You watch what you are interested in? Do you think we should all be forced to watch what you want?