Re:C++ Core Coroutines Proposal [pdf]
by ChrisSD on Friday September 21, 2018 @08:29AM
(#18039182)
In such extreme cases you can (and should) use your own allocation strategy.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Yeah, but I'm not entirely clear how I'd for example get std::vector to use a mmap'ed range, that I could zero-copy grow.
Also in that case I might want to grow it by a fixed amount, once it grows past a certain threshold.
It's a shame one needs to write another vector implementation just for that.
Why wouldn't writing an allocator class be enough for mmap?
Re:C++ Core Coroutines Proposal [pdf]
by BeeOnRope on Friday September 21, 2018 @12:21PM
(#18040769)
Probably not, because the allocators don't expose the "extend" or "realloc" concept, so all you'll see from within your allocator is a request for an entire new region that vector wants in order to copy the new stuff into.
To implement a growing allocation , you'll have to create a custom vector, pretty much.