Re:China’s all-seeing surveillance network
by bopbop on Thursday September 20, 2018 @08:29AM
(#18031794)
>They're just making the point that she didn't marry him for his social credit score, even though he happens to have a high score under the system.
Yes, that makes sense. I still hold that the deliberate omission of her party relationship until later in the article is to initially position her as a third party positive voice who happens to support the system.
And yes, the network affects are particularly awful.
Yes, that makes sense. I still hold that the deliberate omission of her party relationship until later in the article is to initially position her as a third party positive voice who happens to support the system.
And yes, the network affects are particularly awful.