News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Senate passes copyright bill to end 140-year protection f... by tzs on Thursday September 20, 2018 @12:43AM (#18029841)
> To play devil's advocate, why should people continue to be compensated for work they did long ago?

We often don't know which songs are worth millions and which are worth tens until years later.

If we believe that people who write songs should be compensated roughly proportionally to how valuable their songs are, it is hard to think of a way to actually do that which does not involve compensation long after the song is written.

Re:Senate passes copyright bill to end 140-year protection f... by kwhitefoot on Thursday September 20, 2018 @03:57AM (#18030526)
Fair enough perhaps, but then the copyright should die with the author.
Re:Senate passes copyright bill to end 140-year protection f... by ketzu on Thursday September 20, 2018 @04:47AM (#18030736)
The problem I see with this is that there should never be a commercial incentive to have the artist die.
Re:Senate passes copyright bill to end 140-year protection f... by Bjartr on Thursday September 20, 2018 @05:29PM (#18035627)
If copyright doesn't die with the author then there is incentive for them to die if you would stand to inherit valuable works