News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FanDuel not honoring bet that would have paid over $82,00... by monkpit on Wednesday September 19, 2018 @01:19PM (#18025836)
What if there were less zeroes? At what point can the company just decline to pay anything out at all because it’s up to their discretion whether a line was good or caused by a bug? Obviously in that case they would go out of business because people would be mad. But my point is that (in my opinion) it’s a very gray area legally.
Re:FanDuel not honoring bet that would have paid over $82,00... by dumbfounder on Wednesday September 19, 2018 @01:51PM (#18026149)
It was less zeroes and they didn't pay and the guy has threatened to sue. Obviously it's a gray area, which is exactly why there are 2 sides to this argument. Their fine print will either stand up in court, or it won't. But you can't just assume they are going to pay out willingly every time they make a mistake. There is obviously a line where they have to say the risk in not paying out is worth the bad publicity and lawsuit potential. Then they learn from that mistake and move on. Then people use your business moving forward or they don't. That's why I like free markets, the checks and balances are already there to handle situations like this, we don't need legislation.