FanDuel not honoring bet that would have paid over $82,000 due to line error

Re:FanDuel not honoring bet that would have paid over $82,00... by xae342 on Wednesday September 19, 2018 @12:40PM (#18025492)

I feel like we need the Second Software Crisis movement to address the bug riddled software were still making, it’s as though we’re just acclimated to bugs everywhere as being expected. Perhaps in 2100 they’ll look back on this time in software as we do on the early automotive industry today.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:FanDuel not honoring bet that would have paid over $82,00... by JamesBarney on Wednesday September 19, 2018 @06:03PM (#18028027)

The problem isn't that we don't know how to write bug free software, it's that we choose not to because it's far more expensive. It's about business priorities, not lack of technical knowledge.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:FanDuel not honoring bet that would have paid over $82,00... by theandrewbailey on Wednesday September 19, 2018 @01:19PM (#18025842)

Did the early automotive industry move fast and break things? Almost certainly.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:FanDuel not honoring bet that would have paid over $82,00... by delecti on Wednesday September 19, 2018 @05:08PM (#18027726)

I think an important difference is how easy it is to deploy absolutely garbage software. It's just not as easy to make a million cars, or fix a million busted cars, as it is to distribute an app across a million devices, so there's less incentive to get it right when you can "move fast and break things".

[ Parent | on HN ]