News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Code, conflict, and conduct by maxerickson on Wednesday September 19, 2018 @12:21PM (#18025326)
There's no implication of retribution, it's a turn of phrase based on the idiom "hill to die on", which people often invoke when taking a side on a controversial issue. The implication is that defending him is not worth, like, getting a splinter or paper cut or something.
Re:Code, conflict, and conduct by repolfx on Wednesday September 19, 2018 @02:06PM (#18026303)
Well, let me rephrase. Why wouldn't he be worth defending?