Re:Combating blog article theft by delaying RSS feeds
by Semaphor on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @12:54PM
(#18016929)
How do they help? What the author is describing was illegal before and will be illegal after.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Combating blog article theft by delaying RSS feeds
by dragontamer on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @04:45PM
(#18018950)
It means you can sue Google for damages, so that Google's responsibility becomes to prevent copyright thefts. That way, you don't have to run around trying to chase down a phantom no-name dude on the internet.
And if you can keep the copyright-theft'd works off of Google, Bing, and other big name search engines... then you've basically won in this day and age.
--------
Yeah, its an extreme measure. But its pretty clear cut how Article 13 helps in this case. Link Tax (Article 11) may also play a role, but its less obvious IMO.
Re:Combating blog article theft by delaying RSS feeds
by Semaphor on Wednesday September 19, 2018 @03:16AM
(#18022382)
> It means you can sue Google for damages, so that Google's responsibility becomes to prevent copyright thefts.
Nope. You can not. Google is not a content sharing platform which is what Article 13 is about.
You can do the same as before: Send a takedown request to google. Again, literally nothing changes here.