News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tesla Faces U.S. Criminal Probe Over Musk Statements by whatok on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @12:20PM (#18016566)
Max loss being 10% is absolutely not accurate at all in that scenario. Taking the company private would still be up to a shareholder vote and shareholders could determine that the price offered was not sufficient. In that case, there are a lot of ways the stock could trade above the takeout price.
Re:Tesla Faces U.S. Criminal Probe Over Musk Statements by danso on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @12:22PM (#18016592)
Isn't it possible to set the short order at a max limit to cut your losses? (this shows how little I know about having a trading account)
Re:Tesla Faces U.S. Criminal Probe Over Musk Statements by whatok on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @12:29PM (#18016665)
This might help: https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/091813/...

The problem with stops is that you run the risk of the price gapping up or down and your stop getting filled at a much different price than expected.

Re:Tesla Faces U.S. Criminal Probe Over Musk Statements by howard941 on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @01:02PM (#18016995)
I'm an experienced trader in the sense that I've had only bad experiences trading. Thinking a stop loss order would help I (and the order) failed to account for one of those flash crashes that happen for no obvious reason other than to trigger execution of stopped orders.
Re:Tesla Faces U.S. Criminal Probe Over Musk Statements by wjnc on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @01:59PM (#18017617)
With leveraged products (like rolling turbos [1]), that risk is usually on the offering institution? I dabbled in those a few times when pretty sure (or full) of myself. There are no margin calls in turbos, you add leverage to your liking (x 2, x 5, x 10, ..) and you pay a hefty interest on your leverage (say 7%). Your exposure is exactly the price you bought for.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbo_(finance)

Re:Tesla Faces U.S. Criminal Probe Over Musk Statements by howard941 on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @02:29PM (#18017858)
Unfortunately I was long Kraft (the food co), completely unleveraged, and got taken out at a 15% loss thanks to a flash crash-induced stop loss. It taught me a lesson that only losing real money teaches.
Re:Tesla Faces U.S. Criminal Probe Over Musk Statements by defen on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @12:41PM (#18016796)
Sell short and buy a corresponding (shares short / 100) number of call options at $420 strike (which, in theory, if Musk were telling the truth, should essentially be worthless but in practice will come with some amount of premium). That way you have a guaranteed exit at $420/share + option premium paid. You could reduce your option premium cost while slightly increasing your max loss if you went with $430 calls or whatever.
Re:Tesla Faces U.S. Criminal Probe Over Musk Statements by MichaelApproved on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @12:47PM (#18016855)
Why not just buy puts and simplify the trade?
Re:Tesla Faces U.S. Criminal Probe Over Musk Statements by defen on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @05:58PM (#18019551)
That could work too; without seeing the numbers it's hard to say. For example you might have a higher chance of losing your money due to theta decay depending on how far out you're buying. And the premium on the puts is going to be substantially higher than on the defensive calls unless you go significantly OTM.
Re:Tesla Faces U.S. Criminal Probe Over Musk Statements by MichaelApproved on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @12:32PM (#18016699)
The only reliable way to limit losses would be using options.