News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Linus Torvalds apologizes for his behavior, takes time off by serf on Sunday September 16, 2018 @08:22PM (#18002164)
In this thought experiment, which one of us is correct (technically)?

If he's correct: I'd be upset at being wrong about something, but hopefully i'd have willpower to sober up to the fact that I may in fact be wrong once in awhile.

If I'm correct: I'd be upset because a person I respect is technically wrong about something, and then decided to rant about it.

Choice C: What if the question is non-technical? Answer : Don't ask Torvalds. He's not an expert in that domain.

(truthful answer: I've been a member of a project criticized by him. It felt terrible, but not because of some personal sleight; he just happened to be correct about the inappropriate-ness of what was being used, and being wrong is a tough pill to swallow when you're young and cocky.)

Re:Linus Torvalds apologizes for his behavior, takes time off by TomVDB on Sunday September 16, 2018 @08:32PM (#18002216)
There are plenty of people who can deal with a rational explanation about why they are wrong, but who are not able to deal with being bullied.

As I wrote in a different comment in this thread: I would never consider contributing to the kernel because of the chance (minute as it may be) of getting the Linus-of-old treatment.

Re:Linus Torvalds apologizes for his behavior, takes time off by jlawson on Monday September 17, 2018 @12:09AM (#18003145)
Use of the word "bully" here is concept creep.

Bullying is a sustained pattern of targeted verbal or physical aggression.

A person insulting your work is not "bullying" unless they're doing it in a targeted, continuous way in order to get at you personally. It's just "insulting".

More on why you should not be using concept creep: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/04/concept...