Re:Could sonic booms stop hurricanes? (2008)
by yters on Saturday September 15, 2018 @11:34AM
(#17994663)
If there are no bad after effects, then why is it not a good idea? We already use explosives for all the things listed. Stopping hurricanes sounds pretty useful about now.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Could sonic booms stop hurricanes? (2008)
by Tuna-Fish on Saturday September 15, 2018 @12:12PM
(#17994801)
Firstly, stopping hurricanes with bombs will not actually work and will instead make them worse.
Secondly, because clean nukes need to be so huge that they are simply too dangerous for their utility. Think at minimum "more powerful than all conventional explosives ever produced" level huge.
While doing things like channeling to the Qattara depression sounds promising, the actual practical problems of operating with true city-busters are just too great. There are plenty of industrial accidents caused by explosives every year, you don't want to live in a world where a really bad accident can wipe out a city.
Re:Could sonic booms stop hurricanes? (2008)
by fucking_tragedy on Saturday September 15, 2018 @12:08PM
(#17994783)
There's still fallout and there's the problem of nuclear proliferation.
There's a reason the world looks in askance when nations start enriching uranium, even if it can be used for good.