News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Google’s first all-hands after 2016 election [video]. Parent comment

Re:Google’s first all-hands after 2016 election [video] by oriol16 on Thursday September 13, 2018 @08:27AM (#17978021)
treating people equally, regardless of gender, sexuality, or ethnic origin

This is a very vague statement, you can apply to your convenience. You could say Damore broke the principle and justify any penalty against him. I could say you don't follow this civility premise by choosing your partner based on your gender.

Every country in the world has "ethno-nationalist views against immigrants", and things work fine.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google’s first all-hands after 2016 election [video] by zmix on Thursday September 13, 2018 @08:44AM (#17978125)
> Every country in the world has "ethno-nationalist views against immigrants", and things work fine.

For whom?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google’s first all-hands after 2016 election [video] by qwerty11111 on Thursday September 13, 2018 @09:12AM (#17978302)
Pick any country in Asia.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google’s first all-hands after 2016 election [video] by CoolGuySteve on Thursday September 13, 2018 @08:39AM (#17978093)
The world would be $78 trillion richer if countries had open borders. So I'm not sure what definition you have for "fine".

https://www.economist.com/the-world-if/2017/07/13/a-world-of...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google’s first all-hands after 2016 election [video] by smsm42 on Thursday September 13, 2018 @02:59PM (#17981369)
This article is bunk. It makes unbased extrapolation from small-volume migration to a mass migration which has completely different set of problems. ObXKCD: https://www.xkcd.com/605/
[ Parent | on HN ]