News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Brave files adtech complaint against Google by munificent on Wednesday September 12, 2018 @03:10PM (#17972060)
> you could use something akin to Usenet's technical model (as that was a fully-decentralized message board collection).

That was effectively funded by taxpayers by way of universities.

Maybe the answer is public funding for online content, but we should be clear about it. This is an economic problem, not a technical one. Federation might slice the economic problem into smaller pieces, but they still need to be paid for.

Re:Brave files adtech complaint against Google by setr on Wednesday September 12, 2018 @03:25PM (#17972236)
Slice it down enough, and the average user can donate without much issue

Slice it down even further, and it can simply be the cost of entry. In the same fashion that P2P sharing communities usually require that you make X gb of data available before you can join, or closed torrent communities require an even seed/leech ratio, your federated network can require that you allow upload and 10gb of hard drive space to use (or vary based on usage or something)

Distribute the cost to the point that for any given person the cost is negligible is the ideal.

Re:Brave files adtech complaint against Google by mverwijs on Wednesday September 12, 2018 @03:24PM (#17972225)
The GP did ask a very technical question, without any requirement stated on profitability.

The example used (Sufficient Velocity) does not appear to be profit-based either.