Every day I learn something new... and stupid.

Re:Every day I learn something new... and stupid. by haberman on Friday October 15, 2010 @09:12PM (#1797000)

Same is true in Lua (only one number type, which is double by default), though you have the option to compile it to use a different number type instead.

http://www.lua.org/pil/2.3.html

In particular, "long double" on x86 can represent 64 bit integers without loss as well as being floating-point (64 bit mantissa, 15 bit exponent, 1 bit sign). Downside is that it's quite large: 16 bytes.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Every day I learn something new... and stupid. by silentbicycle on Friday October 15, 2010 @10:56PM (#1797202)

Also, Lua has a couple bignum libraries available (a GMP wrapper, etc.) - it's explicitly noted in the manual that using doubles for Lua numbers by default is just a pragmatic trade-off, and they can be adapted as necessary.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Every day I learn something new... and stupid. by wnoise on Friday October 15, 2010 @10:21PM (#1797143)

That's 10 bytes. Is it padded to 16 for alignment?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Every day I learn something new... and stupid. by haberman on Friday October 15, 2010 @10:34PM (#1797168)

Yep. sizeof(long double) == 16, at least for me on gcc and Linux. Keep in mind that different compilers implement "long double" differently. According to Wikipedia, MSVC++ just makes it a synonym for "double," but most other compilers on x86 make it this 80-bit "extended precision" floating point.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Every day I learn something new... and stupid. by SAHChandler on Saturday October 16, 2010 @04:29AM (#1797607)

With MSVC on x86, you can pass /Qlong-double to the compiler for it to "properly size" the long double type :)

[ Parent | on HN ]