News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Effectiveness of Publicly Shaming Bad Security by user5994461 on Tuesday September 11, 2018 @07:15PM (#17964264)
>>> The security treadmill is hard for even the most modern tech companies to stay on. I think the infosec community could go a long way to helping itself by making easier to use tools, and writing canonical guides for common scenarios. Setting up HTTPS to get an "A" from SSLLabs is non-trivial. Securing SSH with perfect forward secrecy is near impossible for a mortal. There's no reason it has to be this complicated.

Agreed on this. Security is too hard to do right and too hard to check. There are no 2 guides or 2 people that agree on the same recommendation.

SSL labs is a perfect example where the top rating is not realistic to obtain.

Re:The Effectiveness of Publicly Shaming Bad Security by __david__ on Wednesday September 12, 2018 @12:06AM (#17965482)
Are you kidding about ssllabs? Every site I host gets an "A" rating, with practically zero effort. What are you running where you can't manage that?
Re:The Effectiveness of Publicly Shaming Bad Security by Postremus on Wednesday September 12, 2018 @03:07AM (#17966165)
Yep. I set up a few traefik instances a while ago with the integrated Lets Encrypt support. All of them have at least an A on ssllabs. All of this, without actually configuring any of the ssl /tls settings myself.
Re:The Effectiveness of Publicly Shaming Bad Security by user5994461 on Wednesday September 12, 2018 @01:43PM (#17971140)
I might be confusing SSL labs with another verification tool that always give B and C.