Re:Dry Water
by briandear on Tuesday September 11, 2018 @05:14PM
(#17963431)
Their patent didn’t last 50 years; shortening the patent period would have had little effect in this case.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Dry Water
by TimTheTinker on Tuesday September 11, 2018 @05:33PM
(#17963571)
I was commenting on the patent cycle in general, not the dry water patent in particular.