News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Amazon is stuffing its search results pages with ads. Parent comment

Re:Amazon is stuffing its search results pages with ads by beaconstudios on Tuesday September 11, 2018 @10:34AM (#17960056)
any time where they are trying to make a profit by selling you something you want?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Amazon is stuffing its search results pages with ads by etatoby on Tuesday September 11, 2018 @10:50AM (#17960207)
Bingo.

Why are so many people willing to throw away the baby (capitalism) with the dirty bathwater (monopolies and others crony deviations.)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Amazon is stuffing its search results pages with ads by HarryHirsch on Tuesday September 11, 2018 @11:06AM (#17960387)
One answer would be that with improved communication and improved transportation the relative advantage of monopolies has become intolerably large.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Amazon is stuffing its search results pages with ads by na85 on Tuesday September 11, 2018 @11:14AM (#17960463)
To use your analogy, it's not clear to me that one can have the baby without it spoiling the bathwater.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Amazon is stuffing its search results pages with ads by beaconstudios on Tuesday September 11, 2018 @11:36AM (#17960670)
you don't think people exchanging goods and services using money as an intermediate exchange (aka capitalism) can be a net-positive? Because any other aspect of our current formation of capitalism is negotiable. We can regulate to counteract negative corporate behaviours (though that has its own set of issues) so that companies are working for the benefit of the populace.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Amazon is stuffing its search results pages with ads by bildung on Tuesday September 11, 2018 @01:17PM (#17961577)
> you don't think people exchanging goods and services using money as an intermediate exchange (aka capitalism)

That isn't capitalism, you just described a market. Markets existed for thousands of years before capitalism was created.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Amazon is stuffing its search results pages with ads by beaconstudios on Tuesday September 11, 2018 @01:32PM (#17961705)
Yeah I know, but my point was that the market plus money is the indivisible unit of capitalism. You can take any other aspect away and it will still be capitalism. Unless you think some other fundamental characteristic is also required? I'm open to that idea. Private ownership of the means of production isn't really one because that existed during early market economies too.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Amazon is stuffing its search results pages with ads by bildung on Wednesday September 12, 2018 @07:01AM (#17967247)
Yes, private ownership is one condition, but not the only one. I'd add capital intensive production (building plants and machinery for automation), the existance of a labor market and the existance of a big class of people lacking ownership of the means of production, thereby being forced to sell their labor on the market. And you have a class of people living off of the profits generated by the means of production (in contrast to feudalism, where people also lived without working, but the means came from fiefs, not from the market).
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Amazon is stuffing its search results pages with ads by beaconstudios on Wednesday September 12, 2018 @07:43AM (#17967480)
throwing in all these requirements leaves you with a definition of capitalism that pretty tightly matches the system we have right now. This is my main issue with criticisms of capitalism - they (rightly) criticise the system we live with right now but instead of looking into individual rules, entities and interactions that cause the problems, we declare that (to quote the comment I objected to) "it's not clear [...] that one can have the baby without it spoiling the bathwater.". It's terribly reductionist to take a complex interlocking system and say "it's not working, we need to get rid of it!" because chances are that the problems could be fixed within the system itself.

Or in software terms, I think our current form of capitalism is in need of refactoring, not rejecting as fundamentally broken.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Amazon is stuffing its search results pages with ads by bildung on Wednesday September 12, 2018 @01:25PM (#17971005)
> throwing in all these requirements leaves you with a definition of capitalism that pretty tightly matches the system we have right now.

Because it's important to differentiate markets from capitalism! Otherwise feudalism would have been capitalism, too.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Amazon is stuffing its search results pages with ads by wongarsu on Tuesday September 11, 2018 @11:58AM (#17960893)
I don't think money is a nessesary ingredient of captialism (though it is immensely helpful). Money also exists in most forms of communism. Capitalism is more about private ownership of the means of productions, with different companies competing against each other on the market.

Monopolies run against the spirit of capitalism. Regulated markets on the other hand are fine as long as competition is ensured.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Amazon is stuffing its search results pages with ads by beaconstudios on Tuesday September 11, 2018 @12:35PM (#17961232)
> Capitalism is more about private ownership of the means of productions

That existed before capitalism - in feudalism, for example. It's true in the context of Marxist analysis of capitalism as that's how Marx decided to frame capitalism, but it isn't capitalism's distinguishing feature.

> Monopolies run against the spirit of capitalism.

Effectively, yes, which is why we should prevent them by either public ownership of natural monopoly resources (public road ownership, for an example to wind up the libertarians) or regulation.

[ Parent | on HN ]