I'm not so sure on the accuracy this. It includes expanded homeland security operations as a war cost, evn though these are domestic measures that would be needed even without active military operations, and I don't see any sign that the costs of new veterans created by post-9/11 operations are being filtered correctly from the veterans of past wars. Not a 100% sure on adding interest either considering the U.S's attitude on deficit spending as a whole, but I am open to be convinced otherwise.

Still a hell of a lot more than the official number.

That averages to 330 billion annually...

Yeah this number is way off. A better estimate is 5-6 trillion and many will say that's also likely too low. A solid estimate, when you factor in excessive defense spending that wasn't technically spent on one war, is 10+ trillion dollars.

The funny thing is that many Americans are perfectly happy with this... but if you bring up, say, universal healthcare they rage against the very idea of the government spending so much money.

> The funny thing is that many Americans are perfectly happy with this... but if you bring up, say, universal healthcare they rage against the very idea of the government spending so much money.

You're over-simplifying the healthcare issue. It's not just about money. It's about individual rights and responsibility of the government.

$900,000,000 per day

Maybe we can write this on a bus :

We spend $900M a day on war. Lets fund our medicare instead.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-latest...

https://screenshotscdn.firefoxusercontent.com/images/8c92ccc...

https://screenshotscdn.firefoxusercontent.com/images/ea01efb...

You do realize we spend $1,500M ($1.5 billion) on Medicare a day, yes?

That $1.5 billion goes to saving lives and curing people, the $900 million goes to ending lives illegally. We could funnel that $900 million into Medicare and help a whole lot more people.

That's a pretty narrow viewpoint, and the military spending could be spun equally disingeniously:

"The $900M goes to vocational training, employment, and cutting-edge equipment for a large slice of physically-fit working age Americans. The $1500M predominantly goes to squeezing an additional 6 months of life expectancy out of retirees and the disabled."

So which of those is really adding more value to the nation?

If you're including treating veterans wouldn't you have ti average over the expected lifespans of those who served instead of the 17 years that have occurred so far?