Re:Why Rust closures are somewhat hard
by tannhaeuser on Monday September 10, 2018 @05:06PM
(#17955204)
Is it wrong to expect being able to implement standard data structures such as doubly-linked lists and trees with back-pointers having known complexity and performance trade-offs in a language advertising itself as replacement for a system programming language? After all, you should be able to implement standard libs in the language itself, and also to replace existing implementations.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why Rust closures are somewhat hard
by steveklabnik on Monday September 10, 2018 @05:09PM
(#17955230)
It is wrong to expect it to be something that you start to learn the language with. Non-beginners write data structures in Rust just fine.