Re:Australia's anti-encryption law will merely relocate the ...
by NamTaf on Monday September 10, 2018 @06:36AM
(#17950758)
Just a side note: Change 'recognize' to 'recognise' since we use Proper English ;)
Re:Australia's anti-encryption law will merely relocate the ...
by hazz99 on Monday September 10, 2018 @09:13AM
(#17951542)
Damn yankie autocorrect!
Re:Australia's anti-encryption law will merely relocate the ...
by thepratt on Monday September 10, 2018 @08:17AM
(#17951210)
Thanks for the template. I based my email off the back of yours.
Re:Australia's anti-encryption law will merely relocate the ...
by gwillz on Monday September 10, 2018 @08:13AM
(#17951174)
It's nick-picking - 25 million citizens. As of last month or whatever.
Also +1 for a good template.
-----------------------
Hello,
I'm writing to oppose the 2018 Assistance & Access Bill. Although I recognize the difficulties encryption poses to law enforcement & counter-terrorism, it is not a strong enough reason to compromise the safety, security & privacy of 24 million Australian citizens.
Every Australian has a right to reliable, mathematically guaranteed privacy & security, not compromised/undermined by oppressive legislature.
Neither domestic nor international companies should be required to assist anyone in breaking privacy protections, nor should warrants allow access to protected devices, and nor should existing legislature be strengthened.
Would these changes help law enforcement catch a few criminals? Probably. Will it weaken the safety, security & privacy of millions of respectable, law-abiding Australians? Definitely.
Cheers,
<Name>
-----------------------
I really hope this doesn't pass.