News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sperm Count Zero by qubax on Saturday September 08, 2018 @09:29PM (#17943796)
Re:Sperm Count Zero by schoen on Saturday September 08, 2018 @09:45PM (#17943843)
This submission was made by a 5-year HN user with 14000 karma. Although I don't know if you've been more active with a different handle, which is certainly very possible, the account whose submission you're complaining about has been active 27 times as long as yours and has 91 times as much karma as yours... suggesting a history of reasonably good-faith contribution to HN.

Edit: it's true that his submissions aren't primarily about IT topics, but people continue to find them interesting.

https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=pmcpinto

Re:Sperm Count Zero by phoschore on Saturday September 08, 2018 @10:00PM (#17943890)
Eh, it was posted yesterday too:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17938276

And a few other times over the past week:

https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=gq.com

Re:Sperm Count Zero by ggggtez on Saturday September 08, 2018 @11:19PM (#17944152)
It doesn't matter how much karma someone has. A repost is a repost, and it's ok to point it out.
Re:Sperm Count Zero by schoen on Saturday September 08, 2018 @11:42PM (#17944234)
I took this as somehow blaming GQ itself. (I don't mind people pointing out reposts.)
Re:Sperm Count Zero by jameskegel on Sunday September 09, 2018 @06:17AM (#17945220)
It matters to me. The reasons the parent outlined are roughly the factors used for my personal trust rating when considering if I mind veering off topic momentarily while reading.