Re:Chrome 69: “www.” subdomain missing from URL
by dTal on Friday September 07, 2018 @07:50AM
(#17933518)
I disagree about the 'm.domain' convention; it's good and useful. I like the ability to retrieve a mobile site on my desktop, and vice versa. Sometimes I'll be on a site that's difficult to read on mobile, and speculatively try the 'm.domain' - often it will work. When the site itself tries to autodetect what device I'm using, it often makes a poor decision that is not subject to appeal.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Chrome 69: “www.” subdomain missing from URL
by usaar333 on Friday September 07, 2018 @08:27AM
(#17933697)
On the downside, the m subdomain makes for terrible social media posting.
E.g. a commenter using Wikipedia's mobile site posts a link to said page and desktop viewers are unexpectedly taken to the mobile, not desktop, page.