Re:Huawei caught cheating performance test for new phones
by hjfa0j on Friday September 07, 2018 @02:45AM
(#17932334)
There's absolutely nothing wrong with shader replacement. Quite the opposite, as it shows the OEM cares about performance. They have two options: convince the game developer to use a better optimised shader or just replace it themselves. The latter is obviously better.
Re:Huawei caught cheating performance test for new phones
by bri3d on Friday September 07, 2018 @04:56PM
(#17937569)
The latter is obviously better? Shader replacement is fairly fragile and circumvents whatever QA process the game developers had in place - if the shader could be incorporated into the actual product I would think it would be better than shipping thousands of patches.
However, I agree that shader replacement is great for the consumer especially in situations where developers have agreed to vendor lock-in/specialization agreements. It's only questionable to me in the sense of benchmarking applications.
Re:Huawei caught cheating performance test for new phones
by lisk1 on Friday September 07, 2018 @04:11AM
(#17932640)
Doom 3 was selling title for Nvidia back in the days. Carmack and Co. didnt wanted to do any optimizations for ATI cards because it wont favor Nvidia cards and they had a contract with them back then.
GPU drivers are still loaded with such replacements, either to work around bugs or to optimize games where a developer partnership was impossible or otherwise rejected. I think that with the shift to lower-level GPU APIs this practice is beginning to fade, but it's basically been par for the course since programmable shaders became a thing.