News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Engineering tour de force births programmable optical qua... by jessriedel on Thursday September 06, 2018 @11:39AM (#17927032)
I don't know if there's a sensible way to define "typical" gate fidelities, and I agree "90 to 99 percent" is misleadingly low, but picking some of the highest reported numbers (possibly achieved in specialized non-scalable set ups) is also not very representative. The engineering of gate quality is too messily intertwined with the rest of the device.
Re:Engineering tour de force births programmable optical qua... by Strilanc on Thursday September 06, 2018 @12:04PM (#17927210)
The article is also reporting numbers for a one-off setup that has scaling challenges, so it seems appropriate to compare against that type of number.
Re:Engineering tour de force births programmable optical qua... by jessriedel on Thursday September 06, 2018 @12:14PM (#17927290)
Fair enough.