News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why Aren’t More Users More Happy with Our VMs? Part 1. Parent comment

Re:Why Aren’t More Users More Happy with Our VMs? Part 1 by antonvs on Thursday September 06, 2018 @05:20AM (#17924928)
It's not just about portability, but also things like dynamic loading and runtime modification of code, which modern systems rely on quite a lot under the hood.

People often aren't aware of this because the actual mechanisms tend to be hidden inside libraries or tools they depend on.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Aren’t More Users More Happy with Our VMs? Part 1 by mbel on Thursday September 06, 2018 @06:29AM (#17925187)
> dynamic loading and runtime modification of code, which modern systems rely on quite a lot under the hood

Can you provide any example? I can't think of any and it sounds very interesting since you seem to be implying that it's common. I assume that "dynamic loading" means something more sophisticated than loading a dynamic library at run-time?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Aren’t More Users More Happy with Our VMs? Part 1 by Iem3ohvi on Thursday September 06, 2018 @06:47AM (#17925249)
Dynamically generated code, e.g. proxy classes and aspect pointcuts being inserted into code and then recompiled by the JIT.

And even "just" dynamically loading a library requires recompilation because it will invalidate optimizer assumptions such as devirtualization (part of class hierarchy analysis in hotspot).

[ Parent | on HN ]