News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The interruptible programmer by gaius on Thursday October 14, 2010 @09:28AM (#1790786)
It's 3 for lions. That's how lion taming works, the lion attempts to process each of the chair legs as a seperate object and has no mental capacity left to eat you.
Re:The interruptible programmer by philwelch on Thursday October 14, 2010 @10:49AM (#1791045)
If you're worried about the lion eating you, you can just feed it until it's not hungry.

Lions are surprisingly not vicious towards humans at all--since there's no species that can fuck with them they don't have the vicious fear response most animals have. That's the real trick to lion taming--and the reason you can tame a lion but not a jaguar. Tigers are the same way. The big danger with either of them is actually playfulness--they don't always realize how strong they are.

Re:The interruptible programmer by gaius on Thursday October 14, 2010 @04:06PM (#1792379)
I'm not worried - me and Aslan get on just fine. So long as you remember he's not a tame lion.
Re:The interruptible programmer by jacobolus on Thursday October 14, 2010 @10:06AM (#1790903)
I’m not sure how you came up with “3” (or for that matter how objects in view of a lion is comparable to “concepts” in the working memory of a programmer). As far as I know this idea was popularized by Errol Morris’s film Fast, Cheap, & Out of Control: http://www.errolmorris.com/film/fcooc_transcript.html

“Dave Hoover:

“The chair has four legs... Now, an animal has a one track mind, For instance, the animal is coming after you with the idea of tearing your head off... You put the chair up, and all of a sudden, he has four points of interest. He loses his original train of thought because this agitates him. He can’t comprehend those four points of interest, so what he does he attacks the chair. He takes his wrath out on the chair. His mind now had been completely distracted from his original thought: ‘Eat the man in the white pants.’

“It’s basically animal psychology. You try to keep the animal afraid of you in that he does not understand you. He does not understand that you’re weaker than he is. [...]”

(The next few paragraphs are also quite interesting, and I recommend the film generally.)

Re:The interruptible programmer by HeyLaughingBoy on Thursday October 14, 2010 @01:42PM (#1791799)
Wasn't that the film that profiled MIT's Rodney Brooks? (robotic subsumption architecture, Roomba?). I think we watched it for a graduate class in AI. It was good.