> Who said that fitness in my description cannot include group fitness?
I did. Because doing so contradicts your conclusion. Though I also said it is not necessary. Lack of independence alone makes you wrong.
> The same argument goes for adding a worker to the workforce. Does the worker fit the existing workforce?
Which same argument? The argument you made was about filtering lowering fitness.
> I did. Because doing so contradicts your conclusion.
Going for the conclusion instead of the argument. You can't demonstrate where my reasoning is wrong, but saying that the conclusion is wrong. Congratulations, you're an ideologue.
> You can't demonstrate where my reasoning is wrong
I specifically said why your argument was wrong. Without independence it is simply untrue.
> Congratulations, you're an ideologue.
I am. Mathematical flummery triggers me.
Who said that fitness in my description cannot include group fitness? The same argument goes for adding a worker to the workforce. Does the worker fit the existing workforce?