Re:The aesthetics of science fiction spaceship design
by projektir on Monday September 03, 2018 @03:54AM
(#17901125)
I can't say I agree with the characterization of B5 as "paling in comparison" vs BSG at all. I've went out to watch B5 rather late, after I've already seen all of these other allegedly superior shows, and I still found it to be one of the strongest if not the strongest sci-fi offerings.
Re:The aesthetics of science fiction spaceship design
by TeMPOraL on Monday September 03, 2018 @04:05AM
(#17901174)
Seconding. BSG (the 2000s one) was top #1 of sci-fi series for me, but after watching B5 recently, I believe the latter has better writing overall. I really wish someone would do a remaster of that series.
Re:The aesthetics of science fiction spaceship design
by ethbro on Monday September 03, 2018 @02:18AM
(#17900722)
As someone rewatching it now, I'm surprised by how few pure filler episodes there are.
At minimum, every episode at least advances a core character. And usually has one Easter egg related to the overall plot.
As you said, compared to TNG, early DS9, or X-Files, this was groundbreaking stuff on broadcast TV.
The writing is occassionally weak, and thus it pales in comparison to more younger fantasy productions like Battlestar Galactica reboot, or Game of Thrones. But at it's time it was groundbreaking.
The moments of epic were really good since they were preplanned and they could be foreshadowed much in advance. Hence moments like (spoiler alert...)
... Earth falling into totalitarian state, bombing of one of the alien homeworld, the Shadows overwhelming Centauri prime, etc, were nearly unheard of narrative high points due to the buildup to them over the series.
There were lot of not-so-high quality filler episodes and so on, which make the series more of a cult classic rather than ... an obvious classic.
And yes, I categorized space opera as fantasy :)