That doesn't contradict the article in any way. The article observes that the inadvertent bias in search results tends to reproduce real-world bias against minorities. It makes no claim that the same frequency mining algorithms cannot also skew results in other unintended ways, like matching "African American Inventors" to your query. Claiming otherwise is dishonest.

Painting a misleading picture of the whole situation by ignoring evidence that doesn't suit their agenda is dishonest.

That's because it's matching "African American Inventors".

I guess it's understandable how this became a rallying cry for racists but if you were to search for "US inventors" you'll find all the white faces you crave: https://www.google.com/search?q=us+inventors

The only racism here is in your head.

The NY Times is alleging "Bias at Google" and cherry picking examples that support that allegation while ignoring evidence that would refute that allegation.

I'm sure all of these examples, both positive and negative, have technical explanations. Further refutation of the claim that Google is biased.

I misunderstood your intentions.