Re:Labor Board Backs Startup Engineers Fired for Unionizing
by 2bitmachine on Friday August 31, 2018 @11:40PM
(#17890063)
It’s not pure speculation- it’s the worker’s side of the story. You can’t discredit their experience because the other side behaved in such a brazenly stupid fashion that they’re probably being advised to not speak to the press at all. Even if management’s perspective was included in the article, corresponded to your framing, the same would hold true. Your skepticism isn’t really skepticism when it leans consistently in favor of one party or the other.
Re:Labor Board Backs Startup Engineers Fired for Unionizing
by zdragnar on Saturday September 01, 2018 @12:45AM
(#17890260)
What is there to be skeptical about regarding the management? We know nothing about their motives, only a few facts. Without the remaining facts, or their perspective, there's nothing to be skeptical about.
I've tried to be clear that I'm open to the possibility that this really is about sexism. I don't think that exclusively presenting one side of the story will lead us to the truth, though.
The fact that the article is missing such important information could be because it's not available, or it might not fit the author's agenda.
The company is very clearly in the wrong here; I'm taking issue with the heavy handedness of forcing gender into a story that, based on the evidence presented, could easily be a clear cut labor issue.