Re:San Francisco Denies Scooter Permits for Bird, Lime, Uber...
by TeMPOraL on Friday August 31, 2018 @05:54AM
(#17884246)
Why? It's not like they've made a mistake. They intentionally broke the law; they've displayed propensity for unlawful behaviour. The reasonable thing to do is to give their business to parties who did not, so far, show the same propensity.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:San Francisco Denies Scooter Permits for Bird, Lime, Uber...
by s0rce on Friday August 31, 2018 @01:45PM
(#17887494)
So did lyft and uber initially, those services are immeasurably better than the previous taxis (although their treatment of employees may be worse but I haven't seen much evidence taxi drivers get better conditions/benefits).
In then end I guess I don't care because I truly believe the rules are backwards and protecting cars above any useful alternatives that may represent a useful future for green sustainable urban transportation.