News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Open source RISC-V implemented from scratch in one night by moetech on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @12:50AM (#17865727)
The web is incredibly bloated unfortunately. I had to upgrade my RAM recently because I couldn't open too many browser tabs without making the system hang, even with javascript disabled. Apart from that, you can do almost everything from the command line so even an old Raspberry Pi could be usable as a desktop computer.
Re:Open source RISC-V implemented from scratch in one night by Erlich_Bachman on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @02:40AM (#17866167)
You could still have a lot of RAM with RISC-V. The web does require lots of RAM nowadays, yes. But it is not a problem in this regard.
Re:Open source RISC-V implemented from scratch in one night by h4b4n3r0 on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @03:43AM (#17866441)
Take a look at Tab Wrangler extension. It closes tabs you haven’t used in a while.
Re:Open source RISC-V implemented from scratch in one night by bogomipz on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @08:44AM (#17867761)
I am curious if you how how this compares to The Great Suspender? I also don't understand why Chrome and Firefox don't buil tab managers directly into the browser.
Re:Open source RISC-V implemented from scratch in one night by opencl on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @09:06AM (#17867896)
Firefox used to have Tab Groups, it got removed but the webextension API got some new features specifically to support similar functionality in an extension.

i.e. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/basic-panoram...

In reality I think it's just not a priority for browser devs because the overwhelming majority of users do not use huge numbers of tabs.

Re:Open source RISC-V implemented from scratch in one night by bogomipz on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @10:26AM (#17868419)
Thanks. Yeah I suspect tab junkies are probably a minority. Do you know is the latest Firefox on par with Chrome in terms of tab usage and memory footprint?
Re:Open source RISC-V implemented from scratch in one night by opencl on Thursday August 30, 2018 @02:34PM (#17879413)
Memory usage in FF with lots of tabs seems a bit better than Chrome, CPU usage seems a bit worse. I think the UI does a significantly better job of handling them though, since Chrome just shrinks everything until there's no text left.

About a year ago FF was really awful with lots of tabs, CPU usage was very high and the UI would occasionally freeze up for 10+ seconds at a time. They're really been making some big performance improvements lately.