News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Zero-Day Vulnerability in Microsoft Windows Leaked on Twi... by dmix on Tuesday August 28, 2018 @01:31PM (#17860813)
People always seem to overlook this distinction... escalating admin privileges is typically one of the easier things for a hacker to do. Getting in is the harder part (ie, remote/browser exploits, etc).
Re:Zero-Day Vulnerability in Microsoft Windows Leaked on Twi... by 3pt14159 on Tuesday August 28, 2018 @07:22PM (#17863817)
(Hey dmix; hangs soon?)

I'm not really sure if that is true. Adobe exploits are pretty cheap and unless your target is in software you can usually get a click on a link one way or another.

Really, to me, the hard part is getting in without needing to have the user consciously do anything since then you're in and nobody could even have noticed you doing something.

Re:Zero-Day Vulnerability in Microsoft Windows Leaked on Twi... by dmix on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @08:23PM (#17873203)
> Really, to me, the hard part is getting in without needing to have the user consciously do anything

That's why I said remote/browser, everything else is noisy and therefore the 'easy' route. Usually this is sufficient for low tech nation states because they attack organizations not individuals, so all you need is a weak human link where noisey isn't a big deal. Then moving horizontally across the organization.

But more importantly OS are terribly insecure and privesc bugs are a dime a dozen. You don't need zero days to achieve that the vast majority of the time.

Re:Zero-Day Vulnerability in Microsoft Windows Leaked on Twi... by 3pt14159 on Friday August 31, 2018 @09:16AM (#17885282)
Yeah, sorry, a no-click / remote exploit is hard. I agree with you there.

But a browser exploit isn't. They're a dime a dozen. Also, I'm surprised that email is still a primary vector that's used to get people to click on links with their work computer. It seems like such a monitored method compared to, say, a LinkedIn contact.