Long-sought decay of Higgs boson observed at CERN

Re:Long-sought decay of Higgs boson observed at CERN by TheOtherHobbes on Tuesday August 28, 2018 @12:19PM (#17860057)

Or gravity, which is an even bigger open question.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Long-sought decay of Higgs boson observed at CERN by rurban on Tuesday August 28, 2018 @02:17PM (#17861322)

Or antigravity, gravitomagnetism. This would be much cheaper to explore. you just need fast rotating supraconductors, best on planetary scale.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Long-sought decay of Higgs boson observed at CERN by canhascodez on Tuesday August 28, 2018 @05:23PM (#17863033)

Could you describe what precisely you mean by antigravity?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Long-sought decay of Higgs boson observed at CERN by drdeca on Tuesday August 28, 2018 @06:40PM (#17863579)

"supraconductors"?

Edit: apparently an older term for "superconductors"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Long-sought decay of Higgs boson observed at CERN by rurban on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @05:10AM (#17866843)

Nope, just my phone autocompletion at work.

For antigravity just look up M.Taijmar's work on the Thirring-Lense effect: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2007082324A1/en?inventor...

To understand gravity you don't need to build super-expensive devices to find the particle-interpretation of this wave force. The Higgs makes no sense outside the standard model. Studying the wave-interpretation as attracting force is easier and also alignable with general relativity. Explaining an wide-reaching attractive force as particle really makes no sense at all (outside QM), as Heisenberg also complained.

[ Parent | on HN ]