Re:BuzzFeed News Asks Readers to Chip in with Donations
by austhrow743 on Monday August 27, 2018 @09:07PM
(#17855856)
Doesn't seem shoddy to me. I agree completely with the quote from buzzfeeds executive staff. The materials were newsworthy because they were "in wide circulation at the highest levels of American government and media".
Re:BuzzFeed News Asks Readers to Chip in with Donations
by eiieirurjdndjd on Monday August 27, 2018 @07:09PM
(#17855265)
Hrm. In hindsight, it seems obviously preferable that the public got to view this dossier. It would have been hard to have an informed opinion about e.g. the Strozk situation without knowing about the dossier and it’s contents.
Re:BuzzFeed News Asks Readers to Chip in with Donations
by malvosenior on Monday August 27, 2018 @07:14PM
(#17855299)
Presenting unsubstantiated rumors as news is not "obviously preferable".
Re:BuzzFeed News Asks Readers to Chip in with Donations
by scottmf on Monday August 27, 2018 @07:54PM
(#17855496)
And Sullivan was wrong. Take a read of the “Veracity” section of that article.
Re:BuzzFeed News Asks Readers to Chip in with Donations
by malvosenior on Monday August 27, 2018 @08:12PM
(#17855596)
I read it and it's still clearly unsubstantiated allegations and not factual news.
> BuzzFeed was harshly criticized for publishing what Washington Post columnist Margaret Sullivan called "scurrilous allegations dressed up as an intelligence report meant to damage Donald Trump"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Russia_dossier#P...