Re:Visualization: Guy-to-girl ratio of every bar and restaur...
by zain on Tuesday October 12, 2010 @07:26PM
(#1785401)
We could've probably normalized this data better. The fact of the matter is that guys use foursquare nearly twice as much as girls do, so every venue will have dramatically more guy check-ins. A 7% male edge actually makes it one of the more female venues in the city.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Visualization: Guy-to-girl ratio of every bar and restaur...
by catch23 on Tuesday October 12, 2010 @07:30PM
(#1785415)
Does foursquare publish male/female ratio user base stats? Based on the people I know, it seems like only males use apps like foursquare.
Re:Visualization: Guy-to-girl ratio of every bar and restaur...
by sp332 on Tuesday October 12, 2010 @10:27PM
(#1785814)
It may be the "early adopter" effect. In some cases, over 95% of (self-reporting) early adopters might be male. http://blog.mozilla.com/metrics/2010/08/26/who-are-our-firef...
Anyway, here's one "female" who uses foursquare: http://twitter.com/#!/Snubs/status/26996595662 :-)
Re:Visualization: Guy-to-girl ratio of every bar and restaur...
by carbocation on Tuesday October 12, 2010 @07:29PM
(#1785413)
Now I'm confused. Your post implies that this is a raw excess (truly 7% more men than women, which is a relative excess of women compared to the citywide average of 2 male:1 female checkin), right? But shasha...sha's post indicates that you've actually already normalized, which would imply that this is actually 7% more men than average, which is already quite male (2 male per 1 female, per shasha...sha's post).
Which is correct? Or am I misinterpreting?
Re:Visualization: Guy-to-girl ratio of every bar and restaur...
by shashashasha on Tuesday October 12, 2010 @07:36PM
(#1785431)
sorry, it is 7% higher than sf's average. this is probably a case of Foursquare's demographic being heavily male [and heavily straight??]
Re:Visualization: Guy-to-girl ratio of every bar and restaur...
by carbocation on Tuesday October 12, 2010 @07:57PM
(#1785489)
Gotcha. That clears it up; thanks.