Path to 2 nm May Not Be Worth It

Re:Path to 2 nm May Not Be Worth It by monocasa on Monday August 27, 2018 @11:31AM (#17852064)

1) 3d printing uses 2d slices. Hell SLA is a photomask too.

2) I seem to remember IBM was looking at microfluidics for both power and heat distribution, like our blood.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Path to 2 nm May Not Be Worth It by garmaine on Monday August 27, 2018 @01:13PM (#17852767)

3D printing is additive. Not sure what SLA is?

I would love to see the microfluidics cooling. I wonder what would happen if you reached boiling though--it'd probably explode the chip.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Path to 2 nm May Not Be Worth It by mhei on Monday August 27, 2018 @02:47PM (#17853389)

In this context, SLA = Stereolithography

[ Parent | on HN ]