Re:Path to 2 nm May Not Be Worth It
by ghaff on Monday August 27, 2018 @10:48AM
(#17851805)
All those things could be the case. I'm not advocating any specific approach. I'm just saying that, if you make performance/efficiency job #1 and make all other language, tools, hiring, and project timeline decisions in service of that goal, you probably make some decisions that are different from today's norm.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Path to 2 nm May Not Be Worth It
by gameswithgo on Monday August 27, 2018 @11:18AM
(#17851988)
Right, and I think there are lot of decisions we could make that would improve efficiency without downsides, if we could somehow change what are the popular ecosystems from things like Python/Ruby to other ones that are more efficient with similar ergonomics.