Look up jus ad bellum. I think if you look at past wars in which the US was the aggressor, and stack them up against the principles of just war, you'll find they often meet more criteria than a lot of people care to believe. Regardless, the military is an instrument of the people. If the military does things you disagree with, vote. Campaign. Lobby. Spend your time and money influencing other people to get off their asses and vote.
I'm frankly a little weary of fighting for a country of overweight non-voters.
Shall I show you the countless studies that prove that voting in a First past the post election system is pointless and does not, in fact, change any policy?
For example the study Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.
>I'm frankly a little weary of fighting for a country of overweight non-voters.
the act of non-voting is itself an action, it is a statement of distrust, disillusion and or disenfranchisement from the system
You believe it is laziness or some other reason people do not vote when in reality they have correctly assessed that voting is pointless in the modern system.
Study after Study shows this to be true. The government does what people with political influence want, not what the citizens wants
Violence is an action used when all other actions have failed and your life is directly and imminently threaten by someone else, That is the ONLY ethical use of violence.
It is not ethical "in pursuit of the international agenda" and it certainty not anything I or the vast majority of Americans actually vote for.
Americans vote for elected officials primary on the domestic policies, not on their "international agenda" this is the problem with having only 2 choices at the voting booth.