Energy Department teams up with Bill Gates to move mini-nuclear plants to market

Re:Energy Department teams up with Bill Gates to move mini-n... by pfdietz on Sunday August 26, 2018 @08:19AM (#17845606)

When you hear "nuclear reactors last for 40 years" you should instead hear "nuclear technology improves at such a slow pace that it's reasonable to talk about 40 year lifespans".

Almost no one cares if your desktop computer can last 40 years. And PV is improving so fast that making it last 40 years would be nearly as pointless.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Energy Department teams up with Bill Gates to move mini-n... by realusername on Sunday August 26, 2018 @11:26PM (#17849263)

Cost of products are averaged for their lifespan, if the solar panels only last 10 years, they need to be 4 times cheaper than nuclear to be at the same price per year.

And nuclear does not improve in a "slow paced", I don't know where you got that impression, there's been a lot of innovations on the last 10 years.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Energy Department teams up with Bill Gates to move mini-n... by pfdietz on Monday August 27, 2018 @05:34PM (#17854766)

Nuclear technology has improved in cost in the past decade by a factor of 6, like PV has? If not, I will call its rate of improvement "slow".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Energy Department teams up with Bill Gates to move mini-n... by realusername on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @08:00AM (#17867529)

that's not how percentages are working... There's clearly some math issues here... And the latest generation of plants are already 20% better than the previous ones.

[ Parent | on HN ]