News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Elm 0.19 Broke Us by heavenlyhash on Sunday August 26, 2018 @07:51AM (#17845508)
> you needed permission to publish a native module Elm's package repo.

See, this, to me, sounds quite reasonable.

A feature is potentially dangerous to the rest of the ecosystem if encountered unexpectedly: therefore, we put some extra friction on sharing code which uses those features, and made it an obvious and opt-in process if you wished to take that potential danger into your project. Great!

Given that... why on earth would it be necessary to remove the feature from the language entirely?

Re:Elm 0.19 Broke Us by oomem on Sunday August 26, 2018 @09:31AM (#17845846)
You can find some explanations by the language author here:

https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/native-code-in-0-19/826